3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group

3S RESEARCH – CRITICALLY CONSTRUCTIVE

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About 3S
    • About 3S
    • 3S Postdoctoral and visiting fellowships
    • Contact
  • News
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Researchers
    • PhD students
    • Honorary Fellows
  • Research
    • About our research
    • 3S Research Topics
      • Energy
      • Climate Change
      • Innovation
      • Hazards and Risk
    • 3S Research Strands
      • Knowledges and expertise
      • Participation and engagement
      • Policy and governance
      • Sustainable consumption
      • Transitions to sustainability
    • 3S Theoretical Approaches
    • 3S Research Methods
    • Current Projects
    • Completed Projects
  • Teaching
    • About our teaching
    • Teaching news
    • Undergraduate teaching
    • Postgraduate teaching
    • Student projects
    • PhD opportunities in 3S
  • Publications
    • 3S working papers
    • 3S Reports
    • 3S external publications
  • Impact & Engagement
    • 3S Key insights
      • Insight 1: The problem – Society is shut out
      • Insight 2: The system is the issue
      • Insight 3: Society can do it
      • Insight 4: We need new forms of participation
      • Insight 5: Learn, reflect, experiment
      • Insight 6: Institutions must respond!
      • Insight 7: Open up, listen up, join up: The 3S way
    • 3S Events
      • 3S Debate
    • 3S Seminar Series

Call for papers – Ecologies of participation: Thinking systemically about science and technology by other means

3S / February 9, 2016

See the call for papers below for a closed session proposed by 3S members Jason Chilvers and Helen Pallett for the forthcoming 4S/EASST conference in Barcelona.

4S/EASST Conference Session, Barcelona, August 31 – September 3, 2016

Ecologies of participation: Thinking systemically about science and technology by other means

Organised by Jason Chilvers and Helen Pallett (3S Research Group, University of East Anglia, UK)

Recent developments in STS mean that ‘participation’ has become a productive term for thinking about science and technology by other means. This has not always been the case of course. Traditionally STS has often entertained relatively fixed conceptions of participation where the subjects and normativities of participation have been largely pre-given and assumed (for example, the prevalent frame of participation as public deliberation). Over the past decade students of participation in STS have begun to break down these ‘democratic givens’ to understand how democratic practices are themselves co-produced, relational and emergent. Forms of participation in science and democracy are being viewed as socio-material experiments and innovations in themselves, thus opening up the analytical frame to symmetrically consider diversities of participation, their construction, circulation, controversies and effects across cultures. This moves beyond discursive and deliberative public participation with science by usual means, to encompass distributed participatory collectives which perform science by other means in hybrid spaces of technology domestication, social innovation, grassroots innovation, uninvited participation, co-design, makerspaces, activism, citizen science, and so on.

While meanings of participation have opened up in STS, most studies still remain centred on situated case studies, which masks important interrelations between cases and views them as somehow separate from systems of science and democracy. Against this backdrop, this session moves beyond a focus on discrete collectives to consider interconnected ‘ecologies of a participation’ and democratic innovations as part of wider systems (Chilvers and Kearnes, 2016). This brings different theoretical traditions in STS, political theory and cognate disciplines into direct conversation. For example, recent work in political theory on deliberative systems emphasises ‘deliberative ecologies’ (Parkinson and Mansbridge, 2012) or ‘ecologies of institutions’ (Brown, 2009) for representing publics in science and democracy. Work on socio-technical system transitions offers well developed systemic perspectives – whether co-evolutionary understandings of system change (Geels, 2010) or emerging work on ‘systems of practice’ (Watson, 2012) – but tends to underplay questions of democracy and inclusion. Co-productionist work in STS varies between more object-oriented readings of diverse participatory collectives entangled within wider issue spaces (Marres, 2012) or more constitutional understandings of how science and participation are interwoven within political cultures (Jasanoff, 2011).

This session provides an opportunity to explore what is at stake in these emerging understandings of ‘systems of participation’, not least when it comes to competing assumptions of science, democracy, society and their relations. We invite theoretical, empirical and/or methodological papers working from any of these (and other) perspectives that seek to develop systemic and ecological perspectives on participation in science and technology. Papers might consider:

  • how specific participatory collectives are co-produced;
  • how innovations and technologies of participation become standardized and circulate across space and time; and
  • how they make up wider systems or spaces – whether that be framed in terms of deliberative systems, issue spaces, socio-technical systems, constitutions, and so on.

We welcome papers addressing such questions from a range of domains and issue areas, including: energy, climate change, sustainability transitions, biotechnology, health, and social innovation.

Please send your abstracts to Jason[.]Chilvers[at]uea.ac.uk and H[.]Pallett[at]uea.ac.uk by 5pm on Friday 19th February. We are also happy to discuss paper ideas with prospective presenters prior to the submission of your abstract.

References

Brown, M.B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Chilvers, J. & Kearnes, M. (eds.) 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. Abingdon: Routledge.

Geels, F.W. 2010. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, Research Policy, 39: 495-510.

Jasanoff, S., 2011. Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4): 621–38.

Marres, N., 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Parkinson, J. & Mansbridge, J. (eds.) 2012. Deliberative systems: Deliberative Democracy at the large scale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Watson, M. 2012. How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 488-496.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
February 9, 2016 in News. Tags: civil society, democracy, multi-level perspective, public engagement, public participation, Science and Technology Studies, social practice theory

Related posts

3S summer conference panels on relational and systemic participation

CFPs for 2 conference panels on participation and experiments

Democracy in the making – 4S/EASST 2020 Conference Panel

Post navigation

← New paper: Participation in Transition(s)
Call for papers – Relational Geographies of Participation →

Search this website

About 3S

We conduct world-leading research on the social and political dimensions of environment and sustainability issues. 3S is based in the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK.

Tags

behaviour change civil society Climate Change climate politics communities of practice community currencies community energy complementary currencies democracy domestication domestic energy use emerging technologies Energy energy demand energy economics energy practices energy publics energy system energy transitions expertise geography grassroots innovations Innovation local currencies low carbon housing mapping participation mediators multi-level perspective niches Passivhaus politics public engagement public participation Public participation expertise publics Realising Transition Pathways reflexivity Science and Technology Studies smart meters social innovation social practice theory socio-technical change strategic niche management sustainability teaching technology transition transition initiatives transitions water

Enter your email address to follow this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Tweets
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • 3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group
    • Join 50 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • 3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar