3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group

3S RESEARCH – CRITICALLY CONSTRUCTIVE

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About 3S
    • About 3S
    • 3S Postdoctoral and visiting fellowships
    • Contact
  • News
  • People
    • Faculty
    • Researchers
    • PhD students
    • Honorary Fellows
  • Research
    • About our research
    • 3S Research Topics
      • Energy
      • Climate Change
      • Innovation
      • Hazards and Risk
    • 3S Research Strands
      • Knowledges and expertise
      • Participation and engagement
      • Policy and governance
      • Sustainable consumption
      • Transitions to sustainability
    • 3S Theoretical Approaches
    • 3S Research Methods
    • Current Projects
    • Completed Projects
  • Teaching
    • About our teaching
    • Teaching news
    • Undergraduate teaching
    • Postgraduate teaching
    • Student projects
    • PhD opportunities in 3S
  • Publications
    • 3S working papers
    • 3S Reports
    • 3S external publications
  • Impact & Engagement
    • 3S Key insights
      • Insight 1: The problem – Society is shut out
      • Insight 2: The system is the issue
      • Insight 3: Society can do it
      • Insight 4: We need new forms of participation
      • Insight 5: Learn, reflect, experiment
      • Insight 6: Institutions must respond!
      • Insight 7: Open up, listen up, join up: The 3S way
    • 3S Events
      • 3S Debate
    • 3S Seminar Series

Call for papers – Relational Geographies of Participation

3S / February 10, 2016

See the call for papers below for a session at the Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers’ Annual Conference in August 2016, organised by 3S members Jason Chilvers and Helen Pallett.

Relational geographies of participation

Organised by Jason Chilvers and Helen Pallett (3S Research Group, University of East Anglia, UK)

For geographers the growth of interest in participation and participatory geographies would seem to go hand in hand with nexus thinking, with both approaches actively attending to interdependencies and interconnections across environmental issue domains, places, scales, and cultures. However, thinking relationally poses significant challenges for ‘participation’ as traditionally conceived within the discipline. Two aspects are particularly important. The first is a relative methodological emphasis on ‘doing’ participatory geographies, which invokes a dominant imaginary of participation as discrete collectives or ‘events’ occurring in particular times and places. Coupled with this is the predominance of relatively fixed and pre-given meanings and normativities of participation in geographical thought – as deliberative, discursive, agonistic, and so on.

Work at the interface between geography, science and technology studies, and democratic theory is bringing forward new ways of thinking about and doing participation, taking a more relational approach. This not only has significant potential for addressing nexus challenges, but also helps to advance the agenda from a relative focus on doing ‘participatory geographies’ to one of also studying ‘geographies of participation’ (which can in turn serve to reconfigure participatory practices). This opens up a number of paths for the study of relational spaces of participation, including:

  • Spaces of participation as experiments and socio-material practices ‘in the making’ – this draws attention to the processes of their construction and opens up to diversities of participation (beyond the public, discursive, and deliberative to also encompass the material, mundane, private, affective, and so on).
  • Spaces where technologies of participation and democratic innovations become standardized and circulate across space and time – this includes the transnational circulation of models of participation (e.g. citizens panels, participatory action research, transition towns) across cultures, places and issue domains (e.g. of energy, climate change, health, water, food).
  • ‘Ecologies of participation’ that are entangled in spaces of negotiation and controversies – this focuses on ‘political situations’ that overflow traditional jurisdictions (e.g. diverse forms of participation in fracking controversies cut across the energy, food, water, environmental justice nexus).
  • The ways in which diverse spaces of participation form part of wider relational spaces, whether that be systems (‘deliberative systems’, ‘systems of practice’, socio-technical systems), constitutions, states, institutions, political cultures, landscapes, and so on.

We invite theoretical, empirical and/or methodological papers that explore these (or other themes) on the relational geographies of participation. In addition we encourage papers that consider what adopting a more relational perspective might mean for remaking participatory practices. We welcome papers addressing such questions from a range of domains and issue areas, including: energy, climate change, sustainability transitions, cities, rural development, water, science and technology, social innovation, and environmental justice.

Please send your abstracts of no more than 250 words to Jason[.]Chilvers[at]uea.ac.uk and H.[]Pallett[at]uea.ac.uk by 5pm on Thursday 18th February. We are also happy to discuss paper ideas with prospective presenters prior to the submission of your abstract.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
February 10, 2016 in News. Tags: civil society, democracy, energy transitions, geography, public engagement, public participation

Related posts

3S summer conference panels on relational and systemic participation

CFPs for 2 conference panels on participation and experiments

Helen Pallett

Post navigation

← Call for papers – Ecologies of participation: Thinking systemically about science and technology by other means
Innovative teaching in 3S leads the way →

Search this website

About 3S

We conduct world-leading research on the social and political dimensions of environment and sustainability issues. 3S is based in the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK.

Tags

behaviour change civil society Climate Change climate politics communities of practice community currencies community energy complementary currencies democracy domestication domestic energy use emerging technologies Energy energy demand energy economics energy practices energy publics energy system energy transitions expertise geography grassroots innovations Innovation local currencies low carbon housing mapping participation mediators multi-level perspective niches Passivhaus politics public engagement public participation Public participation expertise publics Realising Transition Pathways reflexivity Science and Technology Studies smart meters social innovation social practice theory socio-technical change strategic niche management sustainability teaching technology transition transition initiatives transitions water

Enter your email address to follow this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

My Tweets
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • 3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group
    • Join 50 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • 3S (Science, Society and Sustainability) Research Group
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar